This typical article about Hugh Grant leaving CAA to go "agentless" has this line:
Sources close to the actor said there was no blow-up that precipitated his decision, nor dissatisfaction with the job the agency had done.
Sure. He probably left because they were doing too good a job!
RSS Feed - Subscribe to Movie Snark by Email
As the article makes clear later on, Grant believes that he has got most of his parts due to personal relationships with filmmakers, and started wondering why the hell he was paying an agent to do nothing. Now, I would characterize that as dissatisfaction with the job the agency was doing, wouldn’t you?
1 response so far ↓
1 Rosabel // Apr 10, 2011 at 7:35 pm
UVMmhm Kewl you should come up with that. Excellent!
Leave a Comment